About This Map
A map of power, influence and ideas.
Why I built it
I'm Ryan. I'm not a journalist or an academic. I spent more than twenty years working inside megachurches, deeply rooted in the Southern Baptist tradition. A few years ago I began seriously examining the beliefs I was handed, and I kept running into the same question: how did American evangelicalism become so tightly bound to one political movement?
The historians, journalists and scholars listed in the map's Sources panel had already done the hard work of answering it. Their books shaped my understanding. This map is my attempt to put that work in one place, for anyone on a similar journey, and for anyone trying to understand how one of the most consequential movements in modern American history was built.
What this map is, and isn't
This is a map of power, influence and ideas. It follows the people, organizations, money and media that tied American evangelicalism to partisan politics. It is not an argument against faith or against the millions of believers whose convictions are sincere. Many of the people who pushed back against this story, from Jimmy Carter to Beth Moore to Russell Moore, appear on the map too.
Why "The Kingdom Machine"
This map isn't about the kingdom believers pray for. It's about what was built in that word's name.
Over the twentieth century, leaders of the evangelical movement built a machine: denominations, seminaries, broadcasters, donors and political organizations, working toward the same ends. Along the way, the machine came to prize loyalty over nuance. Hard questions became tests of faithfulness, and those who dissented, from seminary professors to pastors to denominational leaders, were pushed to the edges or out. What remained were clean lines: clear structures of authority that kept power where it was.
It was never a single conspiracy. It was a network of people and institutions, often rivals, who found that their interests ran the same way. This map traces how that machine was built, and who built it.
How it's sourced
Every person, organization and connection on the map cites its sources. Claims fall into three kinds, and the map tries to say which is which:
- On the record: the person's own words or actions, court records, official documents.
- Documented: reported by journalists or historians from primary evidence.
- Argued: a scholar's interpretation, always credited by name ("historian Randall Balmer argues…").
In 2026, the entire map was fact-checked against primary and authoritative sources. Claims that could not be documented were corrected or removed, and connections that rested only on inference were cut.
The audio narration throughout the map is read by an AI-generated voice.
— Ryan